Taking into account all the facts we learned earlier: the city's climate, hours of sunlight, and the features of the selected solar panels, solar energy is the best option. We will provide our small community with electricity converted from solar energy. Taking into account all the disadvantages of solar energy, I decided to install 18-20 panels per roof, pre-arranged for easy installation and efficient operation of the panels, in the most favorable place for maximum sunlight collection. Each family can have an energy source and use it as they see fit. We will do the same with the roofs of multi-story buildings, but we will install about twice as many solar panels. To supply the stores with electricity, we will create a single common source of energy. We already know that when solar energy is transported over long distances, a smaller amount is lost in comparison, so we can install the sources of electricity much further away from the stores themselves, i.e., install it in a place that receives the most sunlight (most likely a suspended surface and more to the east). Of course, the solar panels I chose - monocrystalline - are quite expensive, but isn't it worth it? Monocrystalline panels are a great option for our city. Despite the sunshine in Curitiba, there are plenty of cloudy days. Monocrystalline panels work even better in low sunlight, which means that some percentage of energy will always be generated. Also, due to the high efficiency of these panels, they can produce a large amount of energy during peak sunlight hours and enough for use during periods when the sun is inactive (this is very useful for shops). To save money, we will buy the number of solar panels we need in bulk, because the number of panels we need is more than 300, and over time the cost of the panels will pay for itself. All disadvantages can be corrected!